paulwong

          端口掃描程序

          If you need 200ms for each of the 65536 ports (in the worst case, a firewall is blocking everything, thus making you hit your timeout for every single port), the maths is pretty simple: you need 13k seconds, or about 3 hours and a half.

          You have 2 (non-exclusive) options to make it faster:
          • reduce your timeout
          • paralellize your code
          Since the operation is I/O bound (in contrast to CPU bound -- that is, you spend time waiting for I/O, and not for some huge calculation to complete), you can use many, many threads. Try starting with 20. They would divide the 3 hours and a half among them, so the maximum expected time is about 10 minutes. Just remember that this will put pressure on the other side, ie, the scanned host will see huge network activity with "unreasonable" or "strange" patterns, making the scan extremely easy to detect.

          The easiest way (ie, with minimal changes) is to use the ExecutorService and Future APIs: @import url(http://www.aygfsteel.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Load.ashx?type=style&file=SyntaxHighlighter.css);@import url(/css/cuteeditor.css);

          public static Future<Boolean> portIsOpen(final ExecutorService es, final String ip, final int port, final int timeout) {
            return es.submit(new Callable<Boolean>() {
                @Override public Boolean call() {
                  try {
                    Socket socket = new Socket();
                    socket.connect(new InetSocketAddress(ip, port), timeout);
                    socket.close();
                    return true;
                  } catch (Exception ex) {
                    return false;
                  }
                }
             });
          }


          Then, you can do something like:

          public static void main(final String args) {
            final ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(20);
            final String ip = "127.0.0.1";
            final int timeout = 200;
            final List<Future<Boolean>> futures = new ArrayList<>();
            for (int port = 1; port <= 65535; port++) {
              futures.add(portIsOpen(es, ip, port, timeout));
            }
            es.shutdown();
            int openPorts = 0;
            for (final Future<Boolean> f : futures) {
              if (f.get()) {
                openPorts++;
              }
            }
            System.out.println("There are " + openPorts + " open ports on host " + ip + " (probed with a timeout of " + timeout + "ms)");
          }


          If you need to know which ports are open (and not just how many, as in the above example), you'd need to change the return type of the function to Future<SomethingElse>, where SomethingElse would hold the port and the result of the scan, something like:

          public final class ScanResult {
            private final int port;
            private final boolean isOpen;
            // constructor
            
          // getters
          }


          Then, change Boolean to ScanResult in the first snippet, and return new ScanResult(port, true) or new ScanResult(port, false) instead of just true or false





          posted on 2013-03-14 10:10 paulwong 閱讀(381) 評論(0)  編輯  收藏 所屬分類: 性能優化

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 五河县| 天全县| 元朗区| 新化县| 丰都县| 枣阳市| 论坛| 石河子市| 富阳市| 大邑县| 甘谷县| 玉树县| 东港市| 龙江县| 莱芜市| 十堰市| 南漳县| 通渭县| 商南县| 仁布县| 璧山县| 灵宝市| 吉安市| 静海县| 丹凤县| 奉新县| 清苑县| 聂荣县| 芦溪县| 松桃| 台山市| 克什克腾旗| 石河子市| 自治县| 莱州市| 重庆市| 永年县| 木兰县| 孟州市| 德庆县| 西林县|