gembin

          OSGi, Eclipse Equinox, ECF, Virgo, Gemini, Apache Felix, Karaf, Aires, Camel, Eclipse RCP

          HBase, Hadoop, ZooKeeper, Cassandra

          Flex4, AS3, Swiz framework, GraniteDS, BlazeDS etc.

          There is nothing that software can't fix. Unfortunately, there is also nothing that software can't completely fuck up. That gap is called talent.

          About Me

           

          OSGi & Modularity

          from http://techdistrict.kirkk.com/2008/04/24/osgi-modularity/

              The .jar file has always been a great unit of modularity on the Java platform. Unfortunately, it also comes with the classpath baggage, and .jar files were never treated as first class components. OSGi is the next generation component platform that will bring greater modularity to the Java platform. In my previous blog, I showed the simplest OSGi components imaginable. Now I want to expand on that slightly by introducing a third component that exposes a key architectural and design benefit enabled by OSGi.

          A classic design statement in the GOF book states that we should separate interface from implementation. Java provides first class support for this heuristic through it’s use of interfaces, and we use it all the time. We know it’s good design. But another important design heuristic less often used states that interfaces should be placed separate from the classes that implement them. By placed, I mean the modules containing those interfaces. The result is subtle, yet has an important impact on design quality. The HelloWorld example serves as a good illustration.

          The HelloService interface is the specification implemented by the HelloServiceImpl. It decouples HelloClient from the implementation, and adheres to the GOF heuristic of separating interface from implementation. But bundling the interface in the same component as the implementation compromises design quality, and is the basis for the modularity heuristic above. Why? Because while I can still gain extensibility through new implementations of the interface, I lose flexibility in how I manage the implementations if the interface and implementation are deployed in the same component. For instance, in my previous example where the interface and implementation are deployed in service.jar, I don’t have the ability to dynamically replace the existing implementation with another because I can’t remove the implementation from the OSGi run-time if the interface and implementation are deployed together.

          But if I move the interface to a separate bundle, call it spec.jar, while leaving the implementation in service.jar, I do have the ability to swap implementations at run-time when using OSGi. In my Google Code repository exists the HelloWorldSpec project. There are four bundles - client.jar, spec.jar, service.jar, and service2.jar. Still a pretty simple example, but it illustrates the key design heuristic.

          In my initial deployment to Felix, I install client.jar, spec.jar, and service.jar. The results are the same as in my previous blog entry. But now, if I deploy and start service2.jar, stop service.jar, and stop client.jar, the OSGi run-time has managed to dynamically adapt to the changing conditions and discovers the service2.jar implementation of HelloWorldService. To experiment for yourself, do something like the folllowing after checking out the project from Google Code:

          • Build all four projects using ant build.all from the HelloWorldSpec root directory.
          • Start felix (you may have to modify the script - .bat or .sh - to find the felix.jar).
          • Use HelloWorldSpec as the profile if you want to use the bundles already installed, or create your own profile if you want to install them yourself.
          • If you used HelloWorldSpec as the profile, uninstall the service2.jar bundle. If you created your own profile, install spec.jar, service.jar and client.jar.
          • Stop client.jar and notice the message. Start client.jar back up.
          • Install and start service2.jar
          • Stop service.jar.
          • Stop client.jar again. Notice the message. Cool - an environment adaptable to changing conditions.

          As OSGi adoption continues, a new set of design principles are going to emerge surrounding modularity. I show but one example here of the benefit of placing interface in a module separate from implementation. An example of another important design principle enabled by OSGi is a PublishedInterface - public classes in a bundle’s exported packages. Something not supported by the JVM, but enabled by OSGi. In fact, I’ve long been an advocate of the .jar as a first class Java component, and some time ago launched Extensible Java to capture many of these modularity patterns. It’s also why I created JarAnalyzer. It’s time I revisit those ideas.

          posted on 2008-10-29 14:26 gembin 閱讀(604) 評論(0)  編輯  收藏 所屬分類: OSGi

          導航

          統計

          常用鏈接

          留言簿(6)

          隨筆分類(440)

          隨筆檔案(378)

          文章檔案(6)

          新聞檔案(1)

          相冊

          收藏夾(9)

          Adobe

          Android

          AS3

          Blog-Links

          Build

          Design Pattern

          Eclipse

          Favorite Links

          Flickr

          Game Dev

          HBase

          Identity Management

          IT resources

          JEE

          Language

          OpenID

          OSGi

          SOA

          Version Control

          最新隨筆

          搜索

          積分與排名

          最新評論

          閱讀排行榜

          評論排行榜

          free counters
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 霞浦县| 莒南县| 甘孜| 志丹县| 如皋市| 灵山县| 天祝| 留坝县| 淳安县| 长沙市| 肥东县| 年辖:市辖区| 民权县| 珠海市| 盐边县| 凤山县| 凭祥市| 平舆县| 濮阳市| 白山市| 刚察县| 昔阳县| 鸡西市| 永登县| 小金县| 石城县| 大同市| 东源县| 视频| 浦北县| 漠河县| 祁阳县| 平乡县| 休宁县| 芷江| 宜昌市| 冷水江市| 扶风县| 格尔木市| 泽州县| 北安市|