之前一直認為類似：where timestamp>date 這種子句是不走索引的
下面簡單做一個驗證：
c:>sqlplus / as sysdba
sys@EOS >create table test as select table_name,to_timestamp(last_analyzed) date_test from dba_tables;
表已創建。
sys@EOS> create index idx_test_date on test (date_test);
索引已創建。
sys@EOS> desc test
名稱 是否為空? 類型
----------------------------------------------------- -------- ----------------
--------------------
TABLE_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
DATE_TEST TIMESTAMP(0)
sys@EOS> select date_test from test where date_test > TO_DATE('2007-11-5 00:00:00','yyyy-MM-dd HH24:mi:ss');
執行計劃
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 944171586
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_TEST_DATE | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - access("DATE_TEST">TIMESTAMP'2007-11-05 00:00:00')
Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
統計信息
----------------------------------------------------------
7 recursive calls
0 db block gets
18 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
280 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
374 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed
從上面可以清楚看到，timestamp>date情況下，走索引
糾正我之前的認識。
另外再補充一下，date這個數據類型一般情況下很少用，建議產品里面所有的date數據類型全部改為timestamp