Clojure DSL
本頁面概述了Clojure的DSL的所有細節,包括:
1.定義Topology(拓撲結構)
2.定義bolt
3.定義spout
4.在本地模式下或在集群模式下運行Topology
5.測試Topology
定義 topologies
讓我們來看看在Storm啟動項目的例子的拓撲定義
(topology
{"1" (spout-spec sentence-spout)
"2" (spout-spec (sentence-spout-parameterized
["the cat jumped over the door"
"greetings from a faraway land"])
:p 2)}
{"3" (bolt-spec {"1" :shuffle "2" :shuffle}
split-sentence
:p 5)
"4" (bolt-spec {"3" ["word"]}
word-count
:p 6)})
映射 Spout 和Bolt Spces 都是從組件ID到Correponding Spec的映射。組件ID必須在映射間唯一。就像在Java中定義Topology一樣,在一個Topology里,在申明bolts的輸入時,組件ID將用到。
spout-spec
spout-spec
作為Spout實現的參數和可選的關鍵字參數使用 。 目前唯一的可選參數是:P, 這個用來定義Spout的并行度。如果你忽略 :p
, spout將會作為單一任務執行。
bolt-spec
bolt-spec
作為bolt的輸入聲明參數和可選的關鍵字參數使用
。輸入聲明是數據流ID到數據流組的一個映射。數據流ID可以用以下兩種形式中的一種:
[==component id== ==stream id==]
: 在組件上訂閱指定流==component id==
: 在組件上訂閱默認流
數據流組可以是以下中的一個
:shuffle
: 訂閱shuffle組- 字段名稱的向量, like
["id" "name"]
: 訂閱指定字段上的字段組 :global
: 訂閱一個 global grouping:all
: subscribes with an all grouping:direct
: subscribes with a direct grouping
可以參考 Concepts 獲得更多關于流組的信息. 這里有一個示例來展示不同的方法來聲明輸入:
{["2" "1"] :shuffle "3" ["field1" "field2"] ["4" "2"] :global}
輸入聲明總共訂閱三種流。他在組件“2”上定義流“1”,是Shuffle分組方式。在組件"3"上訂閱默認的流,是Fileds分組方式,分組標準是"Field1"和"Field2"。在組件4上定義流“2”,是Global分組方式,
跟Spout-Spec 方式類似,bolt-spec目前唯一支持的關鍵參數是:p,這個用來定義bolt的并行度。
shell-bolt-spec
shell-bolt-spec
是用在non-JVM語言環境下來實現bolts。他作為參數輸入,命令行程序去跑。the name of the file implementing the bolt, an output specification, and then the same keyword arguments that bolt-spec
accepts.
以下是 shell-bolt-spec的一個示例
:
(shell-bolt-spec {"1" :shuffle "2" ["id"]} "python" "mybolt.py" ["outfield1" "outfield2"] :p 25)
defbolt
defbolt
is used for defining bolts in Clojure. Bolts have the constraint that they must be serializable, and this is why you can't just reify IRichBolt
to implement a bolt (closures aren't serializable). defbolt
works around this restriction and provides a nicer syntax for defining bolts than just implementing a Java interface.
At its fullest expressiveness, defbolt
supports parameterized bolts and maintaining state in a closure around the bolt implementation. It also provides shortcuts for defining bolts that don't need this extra functionality. The signature for defbolt
looks like the following:
(defbolt name output-declaration *option-map & impl)
Omitting the option map is equivalent to having an option map of {:prepare false}
.
Simple bolts
Let's start with the simplest form of defbolt
. Here's an example bolt that splits a tuple containing a sentence into a tuple for each word:
(defbolt split-sentence ["word"] [tuple collector] (let [words (.split (.getString tuple 0) " ")] (doseq [w words] (emit-bolt! collector [w] :anchor tuple)) (ack! collector tuple) ))
Since the option map is omitted, this is a non-prepared bolt. The DSL simply expects an implementation for the execute
method of IRichBolt
. The implementation takes two parameters, the tuple and the OutputCollector
, and is followed by the body of the execute
function. The DSL automatically type-hints the parameters for you so you don't need to worry about reflection if you use Java interop.
This implementation binds split-sentence
to an actual IRichBolt
object that you can use in topologies, like so:
(bolt-spec {"1" :shuffle} split-sentence :p 5)
Parameterized bolts
Many times you want to parameterize your bolts with other arguments. For example, let's say you wanted to have a bolt that appends a suffix to every input string it receives, and you want that suffix to be set at runtime. You do this with defbolt
by including a :params
option in the option map, like so:
(defbolt suffix-appender ["word"] {:params [suffix]} [tuple collector] (emit-bolt! collector [(str (.getString tuple 0) suffix)] :anchor tuple) )
Unlike the previous example, suffix-appender
will be bound to a function that returns an IRichBolt
rather than be an IRichBolt
object directly. This is caused by specifying :params
in its option map. So to use suffix-appender
in a topology, you would do something like:
(bolt-spec {"1" :shuffle} (suffix-appender "-suffix") :p 10)
Prepared bolts
To do more complex bolts, such as ones that do joins and streaming aggregations, the bolt needs to store state. You can do this by creating a prepared bolt which is specified by including {:prepare true}
in the option map. Consider, for example, this bolt that implements word counting:
(defbolt word-count ["word" "count"] {:prepare true} [conf context collector] (let [counts (atom {})] (bolt (execute [tuple] (let [word (.getString tuple 0)] (swap! counts (partial merge-with +) {word 1}) (emit-bolt! collector [word (@counts word)] :anchor tuple) (ack! collector tuple) )))))
The implementation for a prepared bolt is a function that takes as input the topology config, TopologyContext
, and OutputCollector
, and returns an implementation of the IBolt
interface. This design allows you to have a closure around the implementation of execute
and cleanup
.
In this example, the word counts are stored in the closure in a map called counts
. The bolt
macro is used to create the IBolt
implementation. The bolt
macro is a more concise way to implement the interface than reifying, and it automatically type-hints all of the method parameters. This bolt implements the execute method which updates the count in the map and emits the new word count.
Note that the execute
method in prepared bolts only takes as input the tuple since the OutputCollector
is already in the closure of the function (for simple bolts the collector is a second parameter to the execute
function).
Prepared bolts can be parameterized just like simple bolts.
Output declarations
The Clojure DSL has a concise syntax for declaring the outputs of a bolt. The most general way to declare the outputs is as a map from stream id a stream spec. For example:
{"1" ["field1" "field2"] "2" (direct-stream ["f1" "f2" "f3"]) "3" ["f1"]}
The stream id is a string, while the stream spec is either a vector of fields or a vector of fields wrapped by direct-stream
. direct stream
marks the stream as a direct stream (See Concepts and Direct groupings for more details on direct streams).
If the bolt only has one output stream, you can define the default stream of the bolt by using a vector instead of a map for the output declaration. For example:
["word" "count"]
Emitting, acking, and failing
Rather than use the Java methods on OutputCollector
directly, the DSL provides a nicer set of functions for using OutputCollector
: emit-bolt!
, emit-direct-bolt!
, ack!
, and fail!
.
emit-bolt!
: takes as parameters theOutputCollector
, the values to emit (a Clojure sequence), and keyword arguments for:anchor
and:stream
.:anchor
can be a single tuple or a list of tuples, and:stream
is the id of the stream to emit to. Omitting the keyword arguments emits an unanchored tuple to the default stream.emit-direct-bolt!
: takes as parameters theOutputCollector
, the task id to send the tuple to, the values to emit, and keyword arguments for:anchor
and:stream
. This function can only emit to streams declared as direct streams.ack!
: takes as parameters theOutputCollector
and the tuple to ack.fail!
: takes as parameters theOutputCollector
and the tuple to fail.
See Guaranteeing message processing for more info on acking and anchoring.
defspout
defspout
is used for defining spouts in Clojure. Like bolts, spouts must be serializable so you can't just reify IRichSpout
to do spout implementations in Clojure. defspout
works around this restriction and provides a nicer syntax for defining spouts than just implementing a Java interface.
The signature for defspout
looks like the following:
(defspout name output-declaration *option-map & impl)
If you leave out the option map, it defaults to {:prepare true}. The output declaration for defspout
has the same syntax as defbolt
.
Here's an example defspout
implementation from storm-starter:
(defspout sentence-spout ["sentence"] [conf context collector] (let [sentences ["a little brown dog" "the man petted the dog" "four score and seven years ago" "an apple a day keeps the doctor away"]] (spout (nextTuple [] (Thread/sleep 100) (emit-spout! collector [(rand-nth sentences)]) ) (ack [id] ;; You only need to define this method for reliable spouts ;; (such as one that reads off of a queue like Kestrel) ;; This is an unreliable spout, so it does nothing here ))))
The implementation takes in as input the topology config, TopologyContext
, and SpoutOutputCollector
. The implementation returns an ISpout
object. Here, the nextTuple
function emits a random sentence from sentences
.
This spout isn't reliable, so the ack
and fail
methods will never be called. A reliable spout will add a message id when emitting tuples, and then ack
or fail
will be called when the tuple is completed or failed respectively. See Guaranteeing message processing for more info on how reliability works within Storm.
emit-spout!
takes in as parameters the SpoutOutputCollector
and the new tuple to be emitted, and accepts as keyword arguments :stream
and :id
. :stream
specifies the stream to emit to, and :id
specifies a message id for the tuple (used in the ack
and fail
callbacks). Omitting these arguments emits an unanchored tuple to the default output stream.
There is also a emit-direct-spout!
function that emits a tuple to a direct stream and takes an additional argument as the second parameter of the task id to send the tuple to.
Spouts can be parameterized just like bolts, in which case the symbol is bound to a function returning IRichSpout
instead of the IRichSpout
itself. You can also declare an unprepared spout which only defines the nextTuple
method. Here is an example of an unprepared spout that emits random sentences parameterized at runtime:
(defspout sentence-spout-parameterized ["word"] {:params [sentences] :prepare false} [collector] (Thread/sleep 500) (emit-spout! collector [(rand-nth sentences)]))
The following example illustrates how to use this spout in a spout-spec
:
(spout-spec (sentence-spout-parameterized ["the cat jumped over the door" "greetings from a faraway land"]) :p 2)
Running topologies in local mode or on a cluster
That's all there is to the Clojure DSL. To submit topologies in remote mode or local mode, just use the StormSubmitter
or LocalCluster
classes just like you would from Java.
To create topology configs, it's easiest to use the backtype.storm.config
namespace which defines constants for all of the possible configs. The constants are the same as the static constants in the Config
class, except with dashes instead of underscores. For example, here's a topology config that sets the number of workers to 15 and configures the topology in debug mode:
{TOPOLOGY-DEBUG true TOPOLOGY-WORKERS 15}
Testing topologies
This blog post and its follow-up give a good overview of Storm's powerful built-in facilities for testing topologies in Clojure.
posted on 2012-01-19 15:38 徐紅星 閱讀(436) 評論(0) 編輯 收藏 所屬分類: Storm