??xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>亚洲一区在线日韩在线深爱,国产成人精品一区二区免费看京
,免费一级在线观看 http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/zh-cn Sun, 18 May 2025 05:03:36 GMT Sun, 18 May 2025 05:03:36 GMT 60 如何撰写高质量论文? zz http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97855.htmlguogang guogang Sun, 04 Feb 2007 07:42:00 GMT http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97855.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/comments/97855.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97855.html#Feedback 0 http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/comments/commentRss/97855.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/services/trackbacks/97855.html
1Q?/font>
(tng)
Why write a scientific paper?
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Advance Knowledge in your research field with evidence;
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Explain your ideas;
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Two key components in a research paper:
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
An explicit
claim
on your contribution on a research problem;
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Evidence
to support your claim;
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Your contribution can possibly be a refutation of a hypothesis of the present problem.
2Q?/font>
(tng)
What to claim for a scientific paper?
什么样的观点能够成为科学性论文论q的内容Q?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Your technique solves a problem for the first time;
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Your technique performs better in the following aspects:
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Higher success rate
高成功率
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Coverage
覆盖率更?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Efficiency
你的x(chng)能够提高某问题的效率
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Usability
你的Ҏ(gu)更容易让用户接受
3Q?/font>
(tng)
Typical Structure of a Research Paper
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Title: Catchy and Indicative of your research contribution (
吸引眼球q有意义
)
文章题目短Q被接收的可能性反而越?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Abstract: include the following items
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
A summary of the research problem;
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Your claim;
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
The evidence;
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Introduction
: include the following items (the most important part!)
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Motivation
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
A re-statement of Abstract
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Significance (
重要?/font>
)
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
An outline of the rest of the paper
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Related Work:
与你的论文问题相关的资料
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
A critical review
批判的眼光对待以前及(qing)现有的方?/font>
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
你的创新?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Problem Statement and algorithm design: explain your idea in detail
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Evaluation: Evidence to support the claim of your research contribution
除非能用理论证明你的观点Q最好要有实验结果与数据
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Conclusion & Summary of the research contribution
4Q?/font>
(tng)
What to know before you write?
写论文前要知道些什?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Assess the audience
Q给谁写
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Assess the purpose
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Read other people’s writing from the forums that you are targeting
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Follow the rules
5Q?/font>
(tng)
如何写高质量论文Q?/font>
Q?Q?/font>
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Choose a promising topic
www.cs.uvm.edu
Q?Q?/font>
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
How to present a convincing case?
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
What exactly is the problem being solved?
你的文章解决什么问?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
How are your ideas significant?
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Is all related work referenced and reviewed?
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Comparative studies with previous work are needed.
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Has your system implemented?
文章提出解决问题的方法是否实C(jin)
Q?Q?/font>
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
In-Depth Analysis of Empirical Results
Enough details for your experiment settings
alternatives
Are the results consistent & conclusive?
实验中重要参数调整与选择的方法和原因
introduction
实验q程中好的结果加以学?fn),坏的l果记录下来让他人避?/font>
Q?Q?/font>
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Introduction
前言
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
1/3-2/3 rule from reviewer’s perspective:
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
1/3 time to read your introduction & make a decision
n
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
2/3 time to find the evidence for decision
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
A good introduction with a good motivation is half of your success!
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Include the following items:
Outline
6Q?/font>
(tng)
How to publish?
Reading
and citing relevant paper from the premier forums! (must)
innovation
7Q?/font>
(tng)
How to deal with feedback?
Q?Q?/font>
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
How to deal with Handling Editors?
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Be polite, but to the point;
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Ask for a change, if a clearly biased or unfair case;
Q?Q?/font>
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
How to deal with conflicting review reports?
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
杂志Q?/font>
Journal Submissions
Q:(x)
Provide a point-by-point statement of change!
每个审Eh修改意见列出Qƈ说明所作的修改
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
?x)议Q?/font>
Conference
Q?/font>
Q?Q?/font>
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
How to deal with “arrogant?and “ignorant?reviewers?
Provide a gentle statement for the “unreasonable?criticisms;
Try and resolve some of their comments
Your attitude to the reviewers is important!
8Q?/font>
(tng)
9
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
文章要有x(chng)和证据;
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
切忌面面俱到
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
明确敌h是谁
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
Choose a promising topic
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
实验数据前后是否一?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
前言很重?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
引论相关文章
premier forums
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
写详l修Ҏ(gu)?/font>
l
(tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng) (tng)
用宽容的态度对待审稿意见
]]>大局之困Q救一个遵U小孩还是一违U小孩zz http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97854.htmlguogang guogang Sun, 04 Feb 2007 07:19:00 GMT http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97854.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/comments/97854.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97854.html#Feedback 0 http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/comments/commentRss/97854.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/services/trackbacks/97854.html (tng)
From: 中国理N|?/font>
来源Q《IT时代周刊?d日期Q?6-11-26 深圳汉捷咨询公司高咨询?靖爽Q供《IT时代周刊》专E)(j)
目前Q网上流传着一个小故事Q且不论q个故事是否有其事Q听hq是饶有兴趣且颇需思量的:(x)
有一小朋友在两l铁轨上玩,一l还在用,一l已l停用。众多小朋友集中在仍然用的铁轨上玩Q只有一个小孩子选择?jin)停用的铁轨。很不yQ火车来?jin)。这Ӟ如果你正站在铁轨的切换器旁,你可以让火R转往(xin)停用的铁轨救?jin)大多数的小朋友Q但是那名在停用铁轨上的朋友将被牺牌Ӏ你?x)怎么办?
问题是,选择停用铁轨的小孩显然作Z(jin)正确军_——选择安全的地方,而他的朋友们则是无知或Q性地在不该玩耍的地方玩。ؓ(f)什么作出正抉择的Z(jin)大多Ch的无知而牺Ԍ另外Q一条铁道会(x)被停止用,自有它的道理。是否代表着q个铁道本n有问题,未经验证׃用它?x)遇到潜藏的危险呢?如果切过M后,牺牲的就不只是一个或一小孩了(jin)Q而是整R的乘客?/p>
我们从小被灌输“顾全大局”的思想Q然而什么是大局Q?zhn)是否期望在“大局”面前成为“规范”的牺牲品?
不由自主的错?/b>
每个读者对q个故事的看法和角度像看万q一样不同,我不想从伦理和逻辑的角度来分析Q只是对号入座到研发理的过E中Q而这L(fng)事例不胜枚D?/p>
甲公司进行Y件品开发,工作非常紧张Q项目经理尽其所能裁剪掉?jin)“不必要”的zdQ例如项目估计、详l设计、评审检视、甚至研发内部的pȝ试——结果是“及(qing)时”交付(sh)(jin)产品Qƈ且要求测试团队不要“吹毛求疵”,影响产品按时提交客户。乙公司已经建立?jin)比较完整的产品研发理制度和流E,也要求研发项目需要遵循规范。但是品质量仍然参差不齐,有的产品发布后非常稳定,有的产品却bug很多Q开发h员到处救火,最后公司还Ҏ(gu)嘉奖?jin)他们?/p>
上述研发理的案例中几乎都出C(jin)目的和行动不W合的问题。这U错位往(xin)往(xin)来自“不p丠Z,像几乎每个目l理都认同项目成功需要完善的目计划和不断的控制修正Q而实际上能称得上有计划ƈ得到遵@的很|见?/p>
W者认为问题的症结首先在于研发l理/决策者是否真的具有明目的,q且充分认同之。这个目的就叫“大局”?/p>
那么Q决{者的目的是什么?拯救在险境中的孩子们、拯救更多的人、强调规范还是其他。如果明了(jin)目的Q决{时׃(x)减少很多压力?/p>
软g企业在实施CMMI咨询q程Ӟ都会(x)hq程改进和过U的目的Q而在实施遇到困难的时候,其真实意囑ְ昄出来——唯一x(chng)的是MQ评估师的“明星签名”。姑且不E是否可以被改进Q连定义出的q程是否机械地符合CMMI的要求都不再重要Q况且成熟规范的q程{同于优质品的观点值得商榷。因此,当公司在“过E改q”过E中出现与商业目标发生冲H时Q“铁轨的切换器”搬向什么方向也清楚了(jin)Q那个叫做“规范”的孩成了(jin)可怜的牺牲品?/p>
诱惑面前保持冷静(rn)
h明确的目的ƈ非易事,它ƈ非来自纸面文或信誓旦旦Q而是来自p内心(j)的“本意”,?jin)解本意甚至难于揣摩他h——最Ҏ(gu)ƺ骗的h往(xin)往(xin)是你自己?/p>
更加困难的事情就是对自己的控制力。如果研发经?决策者真地很在乎产品质量和客h受,认同“质量就是研发h员的自尊?j)”,p够顶住压力和诱惑Q将需求分析、框架设计、评审检视、内部测试等zd做到位,勇敢地向产品抡v大锤。这是短期利益和长期利益的矛N成的结果。尽无数道理试图说服h们:(x)在矛N前只有将眼光Nq才能获得最l成功(前提是真正追求的是长期目标)(j)Q但却少有h能够“富贵不能淫”?/p>
当今C会(x)q不~少理念和方法,彼得·德鲁克等先驱已经这些做得很?gu)Q够我们消化几十年。然而理论就是理论,实践时却是o(h)人沮丧的?/p>
W者认为研发管理中最为困隄地方是“在诱惑Q或者陷阱)(j)面前保持冷静(rn)的控制”——是对自己意志的控制Q进而才能对目和品具有控制力。还是前面那个切换铁轨的故事Q如果决{者期望拯救更多h的生命,那么是否在一活生生的孩子面前保持绝对的控制Q同时也有够的勇气面对“由于自己决{错误而酿成”的惨剧?/p>
明确?jin)工作追求的目标——期望公司持l发展、或是品的?jng)场成功、或是刻意徏立公qx(chng)Ӟq且l理h_的控制力Q或是“仅仅”按期交付(sh)品、或是“一锤子买卖”,q时候才有资D论“顾全大局”,做事情的方式也就不必拘惔于条条框框?/p>
]]> 关于荣i观的故事——十二生?/title> http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97850.htmlguogang guogang Sun, 04 Feb 2007 06:55:00 GMT http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97850.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/comments/97850.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/archive/2007/02/04/97850.html#Feedback 0 http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/comments/commentRss/97850.html http://www.aygfsteel.com/sirius/services/trackbacks/97850.html 好口才!以下是正文?br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 有一ơ,我有Z(x)和欧z贵族聚。可能酒喝多?jin),一位d国贵族站?jin)v来,讽刺_(d)(x)“你们中国h都是属什么猪啊!狗啊Q老鼠啊!不像我们Q都是金牛、狮子、仙奛_……真不知道你们祖先怎么想的Q”当时这些贵族听完哈哈大W,q(sh)相碰杯,先前的优雅完全不见了(jin)?/p>
按理_(d)人家在骂你祖宗了(jin)Q你即没有话说Qv码可以掀桌子啊!但所有h都坐着不吭壎ͼ也可能是q没反应q来Q我当时只好q_地告诉在场所有外宾:(x)“中国h的祖先是很实在的Q我们十二生肖两两相对,六道轮回Q体C(jin)我们先对中国h全部的期望跟要求。”这Ӟ现场气氛虽然从嬉闹{为安?rn),但是他们怸q是一副不屑的样子。我_(d)(x)“第一l是老鼠和牛。老鼠代表智慧Q牛代表勤奋。智慧和勤奋一定要紧紧l合在一赗如果光有智慧不勤奋Q那变成小聪明Q而光是勤奋,不动脑筋Q那变成愚蠢。所以这两者一定要l合Q这是我们祖先对中国人的W一l期望和要求Q也是最重要的一l。”“第二组是老虎和兔子。老虎代表勇猛Q兔子代表}慎。勇猛和谨慎一定要紧紧l合在一P才能做到所谓的胆大?j)细。如果勇猛离开?jin)}慎,变成了(jin)鲁莽Q而你没有勇猛Q一味的谨慎Q}慎就变成胆怯。这一l也非常重要Q所以放在第二。”我看着q些贉|Q补上一句:(x)“所以当我们表现?gu)}慎的时候,千万不要以ؓ(f)我们中国人没有勇猛的一面。?/p>
“实际上Q我们祖先追求的是一U和谐的智慧和圆融,从来不会(x)单独l一个要求和d。”看着大家陷入沉思,我(h)l往(xin)下说?/p>
“第三组是龙和蛇。龙代表刚猛Q蛇代表柔韧。所谓刚者易折,太刚?jin)容易折断,但是如果只有柔的一面,易失去主见Q所以刚柔ƈ是我们历代的祖训?/p>
“接下来是马和羊。马代表一往(xin)无前Q直奔目标,代表和。如果一个h只顾自己直奔目标Q不֑_(d)必然?x)和周围不断碰Q最后不见得能达到目标。但是一个h如果光顾着和周围和,之后他连方向都没有了(jin)Q目标也失去?jin)。所以一往(xin)无前的秉性一定要与和紧紧结合在一Pq是我们先对中国h的第四组期望?/p>
“再接下来是猴子和鸡。猴子代表灵z,至于鸡呢Q以前的q代没有钟,都是听鸡鸣声军_一天的开始,所以鸡定时打鸣Q代表恒定。灵zd恒定一定要紧紧l合h。如果你光灵z,没有恒定Q再好的政策最后也得不到收莗但如果说你光是恒定Q一潭死水、一块铁板,那就不会(x)有我们今天的攚w开放了(jin)。只有它们之间非常圆融的l合Q一斚whE_性,保持整体的和谐和U序Q另一斚w又能不断变通地前进Q这才是最Ҏ(gu)的要旨?/p>
“最后是狗和猪。狗是代表忠诚,猪是代表随和。一个h如果太忠诚,不懂得随和,׃(x)排斥他h。而反q来Q一个h太随和,没有忠诚Q这个h失d则。所以无论是对一个民族国家的忠诚、对团队的忠诚,q是自己理想的忠诚,一定要与随和紧紧结合在一Pq样才容易真正保持内?j)深处的忠诚。这是我们中国Z直坚持的外圆内方Q君子和而不同?/p>
“中国h每个人都有属于自q生肖Q有的h属猪Q有的h属狗Q这意义何在Q实际上Q我们的先期望我们要圆融,不能偏颇Q要求我们懂得到对应面切入。比如属猪的够在他的随和本性中Q也去追求忠诚;而属狗的人则在忠诚的本性中Q去做到随和。?/p>
解释完十二生肖,我说Q“不知道你们那些宝瓶座啊、射手啊、公啊,体现?jin)你们祖先哪些期望和要求Q也希望不吝赐教。”结果呢Q这些贵族老爷们很长时间都没说话,全场鸦雀无声Q一栚w掉在C都能听见。最后贵族们UL(fng)p地表C对中国人和中国人的先非常敬佩Q“没有想C国的十二生肖有这么深刻而实在的意义。?/p>
Q沈?口述)
]]>
վ֩ģ壺
ɽ |
|
|
˫ |
|
|
|
ɽ |
ҳ |
|
|
Ϫ |
|
ʡ |
|
|
İ |
|
|
ƽ |
̫ |
|
|
۶ |
ƽ |
|
¤ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ʤ |
ƽ |
|
ƽ |