锘??xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>成人三级毛片,欧美精品一区二区三区涩爱蜜,久久免费国产精品1http://www2.blogjava.net/nelson_tu/category/825.htmlKeep it simple, Stupid, Less is morezh-cnWed, 28 Feb 2007 16:42:56 GMTWed, 28 Feb 2007 16:42:56 GMT60In search of a better persistence API[杞琞http://www.aygfsteel.com/nelson_tu/archive/2005/03/22/2306.htmlnelson_tunelson_tuTue, 22 Mar 2005 00:36:00 GMThttp://www.aygfsteel.com/nelson_tu/archive/2005/03/22/2306.htmlhttp://www.aygfsteel.com/nelson_tu/comments/2306.htmlhttp://www.aygfsteel.com/nelson_tu/archive/2005/03/22/2306.html#Feedback0http://www.aygfsteel.com/nelson_tu/comments/commentRss/2306.htmlhttp://www.aygfsteel.com/nelson_tu/services/trackbacks/2306.html20% Homegrown Persistence Framework
10% O/R Mapping Tools
5% Java Data Objects (JDO)
5% EJB CMP / BMP
0% Service Data Objects (SDO)

Considering that ORM only has 10% of the market, and "seldom is a good choice in systems typically with very large dataset and complex queries" one can wonder what the fuss is all about?

Why not settle for a common abstraction layer and let each run according to own taste. It should be obvious by now that it is never going to be any consensus between the different persistence camps.

One big advantage is that it will not be necessary to frisk for weapons at the entrance to conferences and seminars! :)

Yi Zhou:
"I propose a cohesive persistence layer based on Spring Persistence Layer"

The obvious solution. (Think logic, reason, common sense. Exist for both Java and .NET) Can anyone imagine how much money that could be saved by this approach? All over the world?

Unfortunatly there is never possible to settle for anything obvious as long as a committee is involved.

Regards
Rolf Tollerud


nelson_tu 2005-03-22 08:36 鍙戣〃璇勮
]]>
主站蜘蛛池模板: 沿河| 盐山县| 宜丰县| 西华县| 永登县| 韶关市| 宿州市| 永胜县| 肥乡县| 汨罗市| 兴宁市| 柏乡县| 奇台县| 峨边| 肥乡县| 甘泉县| 昭觉县| 南溪县| 明光市| 康保县| 班戈县| 三穗县| 新密市| 海伦市| 黄大仙区| 深水埗区| 通山县| 苗栗市| 遂平县| 尚志市| 上思县| 河东区| 会同县| 民勤县| 乾安县| 定远县| 宜城市| 襄城县| 凤山市| 疏勒县| 荃湾区|